Little Miss Julie Spoiler Free Review

Little Miss Julie - 9 out of 10
Sturm Theatre Company
TICKETS: Little Miss Julie | Adelaide Fringe

Little Miss Julie is a new adaptation of August Strindberg’s 1888 play, Miss Julie, written by James Harvy and presented by the newly formed Sturm Theatre Company. With Strindberg’s original work running an already lean 80 to 90 minutes, Harvy has done well to bring it down to just over an hour, tailoring it perfectly for the fast-paced Fringe circuit.

Harvy’s adaptation shifts Strindberg’s tragedy of desires for social mobility and self-discovery to the basement kitchen of a New York City mansion in the Gilded Age. Social class is still a strong divide between our characters, but Harvy introduces age into the power dynamics, taking Strindberg’s original 5-year age gap and aging Miss Julie down to 21 and John up to at least 35.

The standout of this production is its ensemble: Harvy as John, Ruby Patrich as Julie, and Sarah Jeavons as Christine. Harvy and Jeavons share the stage like an old married couple and present John and Christine with the full and complex past that the characters share together. Their accents throughout the show were accurate and never got in the way of the audience understanding their lines.

Harvy’s portrayal of John and the gradual reveal of a scheming social climber is nuanced; he presents the character’s manipulation of others as a rational, almost reasonable response to the desire for a better life. Patrich effectively embodies the innate privilege of Julie’s upbringing and the emotional rollercoaster she undergoes in the second half of the show. Her desperation is palpable upon discovering she has no way out – realising she was never truly in control, but rather seduced and used by John. Meanwhile, Jeavons tackles the production’s most challenging role; Harvy’s adaptation further corrupts Strindberg’s hypocritical moral centre, providing a pragmatic, darker backstory for how she secured John’s position. This gives Jeavons a substantial, cynical foundation to latch onto when she ultimately refuses to aid Julie in her hour of need.

The set is sparse, with some old pine furniture making up the basement kitchen; everything has a purpose for being there. They don’t make the mistake of trying to use the entire depth of the stage, thereby adding to the claustrophobic nature of the play, furthering the clear intentionality of the set and blocking. The sound design has been well crafted, providing just the right amount of scene setting while allowing the actors to be the sole focus of the audience. While the set and sound craft a tight, naturalistic world, the lighting falters with unintentional shadows and jarring transitions that pull the audience out of the kitchen’s intimacy.

Harvy, Jeavons, and Patrich should be incredibly proud of the work they have created and in originating these new interpretations of Strindberg’s characters. Harvy certainly needs to get this new adaptation published and licensed; I suspect theatre companies across Australia and around the English-speaking world will want to add it to a future season.

–Scott

Comments