A Rock in the Limbus - 7 out of 10
PitchWhite Productions
TICKETS: End of Season
Ambitious, enigmatic, and often baffling, A Rock in the Limbus is the latest original work from Adelaide playwright Lochie Daniel. This production – Daniel’s third – demonstrates a maturing of his voice, even as it leaves the audience scratching their heads. The post-show Q&A felt less like a courtesy and more a necessity for an audience struggling to reconcile the surreal events on stage with their own reality.
The set in Act 1 is remarkable for its simplicity. The
titular rock stands proudly centre stage and is flanked on each side by a pair
of projection flats. These flats are used to set the scene. The opening of the
production is a projection journey through the history of the universe, Earth
and humanity up to now and into a hypothetical future before we snap to a
collage of overlapping news footage, hinting at some of the many underlying
themes of the play before finally settling in the outback, a few kilometres outside
of Alice Springs where The Rock is found by Hazel and Oli. Tucked into the
scene is a standout piece of stagecraft: a mostly obscured old car, rendered so
realistically that you’d be forgiven for thinking the production team had
driven a genuine vehicle onto the stage for its brief appearance. Act 2 has a
lot more clutter on stage with a vast array of electronic paraphernalia to
stand in as the scientific testing equipment. Unfortunately, because it must
remain on stage for the duration of Act 2 it sometimes becomes a distraction as
some stories are told in other locations like a hotel room, the Adelaide
Parklands and a hospital waiting room.
The technical aspects are well handled after some unexpected
teething issues brought opening night to an early end. The projections are
smooth with the news footage transitions being particularly well mapped to the
projection screens. The lighting was adequate though at times a little
heavy-handed when showing the effect of The Rock. The underscoring of the
production was composed by Will Everett and had a suitably science fiction
mixed with suspense thriller vibe. It was at its most effective during the opening
projections.
This production demands a lot of its three-person cast and
each one of them must be commended for creating more than 60 different
characters between them. Gracie Greenrod’s two main roles of geologist Heidi
and video game developer Julia are two characters who are significantly older
than Greenrod herself. She does well to bridge this age gap, conveying the
weight of their life experiences—both as mothers and as women at the peaks of
their respective professional careers. As Heidi, Greenrod conveys the deep loss
she has experienced through the loss of several family members to cancer, the
pandemic or other unfortunate circumstances while wrestling with her faith in
God. While as Julia, Greenrod successfully plays out a woman with deep-seated
self-esteem issues that are impacting her sex life and relationship with her
husband.
Holly Hastings has an easier time portraying Hazel and Nova
both with a stage age much closer to her own, but still two unique characters.
Hazel is a young adult who perpetually feels the need to perform friendship
with her university and work colleagues while relishing the opportunity to
truly be herself and just exist when with her best friend Oli. While Nova, a
young research assistant on assignment with Greenrod’s Heidi, is escaping from
the disastrous end of a relationship.
Isiah Macaspac portrays Oli (Hazel’s best friend), Eric (Julia’s husband and co-video game developer) and Lucas the billionaire funding the research being carried out by Heidi and Nova; three more different characters you could not imagine. As Oli, Macaspac captures his awkward, always unsure of himself nature, while Macaspac clearly relishes the cocksure entitlement of the billionaire Lucas, introduced in the play's final minutes.
The sheer scale of the character-swapping mentioned earlier
is most evident during the Act 1 BBQ scene, where they conjure a rotating cast
of over 20 characters through a kaleidoscope of accents and a single costume
piece. Greenrod, Hastings, and Macaspac dial the energy to 11, creating a
frantic microcosm of human society. The most seamless transitions utilised the
six-foot monolith as a physical 'wipe,' with actors disappearing behind the
stone and re-emerging instantly as someone new. Conversely, the character swaps
performed in plain sight were less effective, forcing the audience to play a
brief game of catch-up with the narrative.
Ultimately, the production's success hinges on the writing,
which feels like two disparate plays joined at the hip. Act 1 is a zany,
satirical exploration of how humanity clings to control when faced with the unknown,
using stories new and old to attach meaning. Summed up best at the end of Act 1
as the United Nations (as a stand in for secular science), a religious leader
and an American hick vie for control of The Rock before regressing to a highly
stylised and exaggerated immaturity. However, Act 2 takes a jarring turn into a
serious drama with supernatural undertones as The Rock “forces” some of our
protagonists into drastically out of character actions. These narratives leap,
combined with several lengthy monologues in the second half, causing the pace
to stumble just as the tension should be peaking.
A Rock in the Limbus is a play that wants to ask a lot of
questions of the audience; not all of them are related to each other and some
are barely half-formed. Daniel describes the play as an exploration of whether
our 'Rift Valley' biology is equipped for the hyper-connected modern world. It
is a fascinating, intellectually dense premise that occasionally buckles under
its own weight. With a sharper dramaturgical eye and a more focused script, A
Rock in the Limbus could be a powerhouse. For now, it remains a complicated,
slightly unbalanced piece of theatre – one that is more interested in the
pursuit of questions than the comfort of answers, though it hasn't quite found
the structural balance to hold them all yet.
- Scott


Comments
Post a Comment